Further issue are two articles by Rabbi Ilai:

One of the main plot of the book of Ruth - although hidden behind the scenes - is the question of conversion of vacuum. Torah [Deuteronomy W-M] establishes a prohibition to convert Muebeim hostile behavior toward Israel 'on something that is not preceded you with bread and water. Although the Talmud [Yevamot attorney-in] clarifies that the fault lies only Hmuebeim men and women that "it is a woman's way of promoting. The proof also was modest conduct of Sarah [Genesis R-T]. We learn a halachic decision (permit conversion of vacuum) from a comprehensive basic assumption about the nature of humanity (not the way of a woman advance) which in turn acts fathers taught. Side note here might have an interesting clue to understanding sandwich ideas the Midrash [Gen. much AA], look at the Torah, and created Alma '
Not far from the same set of [total-in] Another issue we find a somewhat similar structure. The issue deals with a woman charged for borrowing commandments of procreation. See Il'ay determines the charge does not apply to a woman that same breath with the command 'Be fruitful and multiply' [Genesis-power] verse continues: sandwich ideas "fill the earth and subdue it. 'A ramp and there is no way a woman through her sheep, says Rabbi Ilai, a sign that the command does not apply. sandwich ideas As the first issue, the halachic solution based on the general premise of a man on his own nature
Further issue are two articles by Rabbi Ilai: 'Just as a person who commands say something that sounds so orders the person to say anything that does not sound', and 'Like hell for a person to change about peace. Ostensibly these articles sandwich ideas are not related to the original issue, and are brought here by the way the first article of the Amora. But we will try to call the issue a little differently, and it seems more articles by Rabbi Ilai explain and basing his first article
Indeed, what woman would not be a commandment of procreation? The reason is that a woman, even with the charge that, in view of its nature will not engage in the occupation of the country. In this case it is better not to force it at all, ie Not to tell her something that will hear (Article Two of Rabbi Ilai). On the other hand why the Torah commandment to put the plural - 'Be fruitful and multiply' sandwich ideas - If the command belongs only to men? Although imperative applies only man, the result sandwich ideas is achieved only in conjunction with a woman. If emphasized the role of the man too much at the expense of women - that would be a breach of balance, it is peace. Because sandwich ideas of this verse matter concerning peace '(third article of R. Il'ay) and faces equally both Man and Woman