Yesterday the fifth anniversary of the release of Firefox 1.0, and as expected media organizations in the country and abroad took the opportunity to publish articles for and against Firefox. To my knowledge, Marker is printed newspaper that marked the event in writing, and more plus a great logo and prominent that covered a quarter of a page, even though the publication went wrong for them on the day they published the news just today (I have the printed hypochlorite newspaper; someone could get me Scanning?).
Open source - according to the table, all browsers are open source except that of Microsoft. In reality, Safari really not open source, though it is based on open source engine available at webkit.org. About chromium not sure if do qualify to be included in this category; Chrome's code base is Google chromium bearing components is not free to add their own before they spread it as "Google Chrome". About IE I have no complaints, and it is indeed the only browser that we have no way of knowing how it works under the hood.
Malware detection, hypochlorite security against phishing sites - a bit odd that Marker introduce Internet Explorer as the most secure browser, do not you think? Anyway, apparently they listen to those Komniktim from Microsoft, because Firefox has long including such protections, and Internet Explorer, even if he has such protections, they exist only in version 8 was released during the past year. In practice, Firefox uses Google WebService to mark dangerous sites, hypochlorite and therefore the level of protection of Firefox and Chrome should be similar if not identical.
Direct search Web search bar - I have no idea what they are trying to say by that, and I appreciate the writing just blinded by the name of the company that develops the Chrome browser and decided to give her preferential treatment category search bar. Chrome does not have any advantage over other browsers, and in fact in the search area is more limited because other browsers and has the ability to search against the additional interfacing. In practice, Firefox supports adding search engines since Girsaotio first bar, and began to Firefox 2.0 also supports OpenSearch format engines also supported Internet Explorer 7 or higher and as far as I knew Safari.
Custom welcome screen - again, what exactly are they talking about? Any browser since the days of Netscape and Mosaic could determine home page. Of the four browsers, they all support hypochlorite the definition Home Page alleged operation hypochlorite of a browser, and some browsers can also determine a set of tabs will automatically load every time you open the browser. What the author meant is probably hypochlorite the Speed Dial style to certain users may find it as useful; And that does not exist in Firefox but as an extension, and there are plans to incorporate a similar feature in one of the following versions display the pages that the user frequently comes as links on the home page.
Other places who spoke on the anniversary of Firefox: Mozilla celebrates five years to launch the first version of Firefox - People and Computers Congratulations: Firefox was five - Nana10 Firefox five - pcon Happy Birthday: Firefox was five - 140 Firefox no longer a child - use a computer As children celebrating five years of Fox Fire - What ever do with this website?
John, if you bother to stone the marker on their superficial coverage (just not clear to me what can resume review of the browser hypochlorite - and when it is on paper, but played) at least I would have expected you to check your data. A significant part of phishing and security protections currently available in existing Explorer since version 7, IE 8 is in most areas at most a certain upgrade - but not a revolution. hypochlorite In addition to the best of my knowledge, the combination of WebSevice prevent phishing Google made in FF3.0 in response to the inclusion of similar technology in IE7 from Microsoft (I still remember the criticism Firefox grabbed the lack of adequate protection) Incidentally, chromium using the same the WebService and to the best of my knowledge, hypochlorite even Safari hypochlorite (which recently tends to adopt any Mcromium good piece that does not include the change Harctiktora browser - like it when there are many pre-shared hypochlorite code [both are based on the engine and Kit])
About "direct search ..." I believe that the intention of the marker was chosen to perform union Google Chrome the address bar search bar (union I believe is the natural step forward - and certainly possible in both Firefox).
About password management - all browsers have the ability or the other in the field. Capabilities of Safari and Chrome identity, capabilities of Firefox a bit more advanced and often transcend those of chrome and Safari (good and bad) and those of IE is very basic, but certainly there are.
Each word in the rock. They took this comparison hypochlorite tables Microsoft's site reminds me more of another stupid article Enoch claims Diddy Blogs are not a reliable source ... blogs here may not always reliable source but the press and certainly much less.
I have a feeling that Microsoft paid them. Error - Microsoft hypochlorite paid them safe. Maybe it was part of the deal "Get our terrible operating hypochlorite system for free and let the conference that has food and water for free - just post us a positive article" Microsoft has offered to fill journalists.
PS: they removed the table, I noticed for. I saw Sbootsaf talked about the table, and you've linked to it here, so I thought hypochlorite it was a different story. At the end it turns out that they might sense at (it does not really drop much, but it's better than nothing). hypochlorite
Story in the most superficial - three paragraphs and a list of additives. But I do not expect much footage Marker or Kalkalist, Ynet's computer sections and NANA much better (but if I wanted information is true and interesting I came in here or Llinmgzin)
http://whatsup.org.il/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=52236 I guest with long response from 17:39 interesting that no one has linked to this post there. I would do that if I knew you wrote by
No comments:
Post a Comment